OzVMX Forum

Marketplace => eBay Finds => Topic started by: mainline on September 23, 2010, 09:19:49 pm

Title: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: mainline on September 23, 2010, 09:19:49 pm
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/KX125-dirt-bike-86-model-/220672454619?pt=AU_Motorcycles&hash=item33611a6fdb
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Nathan S on September 23, 2010, 09:48:08 pm
Quote
This bike has been a excellent second bike for our son but he has now outgrown it.

"Second bike for our son", not "bike for our second son", you clown.  :D
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: mainline on September 23, 2010, 10:27:06 pm
Have another look dufus
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: VMX247 on September 23, 2010, 10:44:03 pm
Its an NSW selling a pre90 bike--be gentle mainline   ;D   :-*
cheers
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Nathan S on September 23, 2010, 10:48:10 pm
Have another look dufus

Nope, still missed it.
You'll have to type more slowly.
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: lukeb1961 on September 24, 2010, 03:09:24 am
"good second kids bike"
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: firko on September 24, 2010, 06:54:32 am
What's so hard about 'second bike bike for our son", as in it was the kids other bike? Am I missing something here?

Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: PEZBerq on September 24, 2010, 07:29:05 am
Mainline you are too subtle for your own good :D :D  You would make a good editor of the Courier Mail - do us a favour and delete most of the rubbish printed within its pages!

The second kid was good and got a bike ;D.  Maybe the first kid was bad and didn't get one ????
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Nathan S on September 24, 2010, 08:53:19 am
"good second kids bike"

That's not what it says!

Try this:
The seller has ONE child, who happens to be a boy (ie: His son).
The son had a first bike, which we'll assume was a YZ80.
Then he got his second bike, which was this KX125.
Now the kid wants something better, so the KX is for sale.

"second bike for our son"

Now I understand why Mainline lives in Queensland. Once I work out why Vandy and Barsby are there, we can start building a wall around the place. ;D
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: mainline on September 24, 2010, 09:08:01 am
something must be dangling in front of your eyes Nathan

Quote
KX125 dirt bike 86 model
good second kids bike


Anywho, the sign of a really funny joke is one that needs explaining ::) ;D
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: vandy010 on September 24, 2010, 09:13:49 am
Now I understand why Mainline lives in Queensland. Once I work out why Vandy and Barsby are there, we can start building a wall around the place. ;D
Barsby has left the building.
as for why am i here?
i'll figure it out sooner or later.
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: shorelinemc on September 24, 2010, 09:18:04 am
VERY BIG WALL ,MACHINE GUN EMPLACEMENTS AT THE TICK GATES AND ALL BORDER CROSSINGS TO KEEP ALL MEXICANS SOUTH OF THE BORDER ;D
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: firko on September 24, 2010, 09:49:11 am
This bike has been a excellent second bike for our son but he has now outgrown it.
If anyone thinks this means "a bike for our second son" I'd be booking in to Dyslexics R Us for a tuneup.
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: YZ250H on September 24, 2010, 09:58:34 am

Now I understand why Mainline lives in Queensland. Once I work out why Vandy and Barsby are there, we can start building a wall around the place. ;D

Bahahahahahaha - I have escaped to WA  :P  I could offer some comments, but I fear I would upset my WA countrymen  ::)
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: monaro308 on September 24, 2010, 10:17:53 am
Hmmm i'll play....does it have anything to do with the fact that Nathan has an KX125 and its classed as a "kids bike?"

If not...maybe we should put that wall up after all.....the pink elephants and q/land marijuana crop is taking effect ;D
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: TM BILL on September 24, 2010, 01:49:56 pm
Maybe he changed the wording ??? as it reads now Nathan and Firko are right  ;)
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: VMX247 on September 24, 2010, 01:54:55 pm
KX125 dirt bike 86 model
good second kids bike
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Tossa on September 24, 2010, 02:08:45 pm
so does this mean that all those riding 125's are just good second kids!!!
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: vandy010 on September 24, 2010, 02:11:45 pm
i not long ago spoke with Paul on the phone.
i couldn't understand him ???
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Nathan S on September 24, 2010, 02:20:17 pm
Found it - its in the second part of the Auction title. A lot more obvious when you see the list of auctions, rather than going directly to the item's auction page.

I take it that you're an eldest child, still holding onto an old grudge, Hairdo?
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: VMX247 on September 24, 2010, 02:21:21 pm
"good second kids bike"

Quote
KX125 dirt bike 86 model
good second kids bike

Its the way you interprit the words ,,it needs a commer ---good,second kids bike or good kids, second bike
Its just an aussie(english) grammer thing  :-\
cheers
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Graeme M on September 24, 2010, 02:30:00 pm
Now I know why that Pre 90 thread ended up as it did...
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: lukeb1961 on September 24, 2010, 02:55:07 pm
"good second kids bike"

That's not what it says!
stay calm.
(http://srvnyq.bay.livefilestore.com/y1p-o8WkzRTEx6m7CTvFoGEx2FlTfyyvrOhdrqGmDhnzQOrQS1AUtYNqwda9nFLrI7eYAvjy0shhmU5Lg5-qtAPPTOQ_fDmXYTf/goodsecondkidsbike.jpg?psid=1)
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: mainline on September 24, 2010, 03:06:30 pm
This is way funnier than the pre95 thread
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: firko on September 24, 2010, 03:24:18 pm
It had me fuc*ed. I had no idea what you blokes were on about until Lukes post. I should have known that Nathan and I agreeing on something would have some evil twist in the end. Having said that, a whole thread dedicated to one badly worded line in an otherwise OK ad is disturbing.  ::)

Oh look....it's 3:23, time to hit the pub. This'll be an interesting social experiment as it's my first time in a pub in my new role as a teetotaller. :)
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: worms on September 24, 2010, 03:39:39 pm
must be from the pre95 crowd, as they shorten everything they say, NSW too, well I'll be a worm hunter.

good second coming worm


Cheers Trev
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: LWC82PE on September 24, 2010, 03:42:33 pm
I was the same as Firko and i could not work out what the heck this thread was on about and couldnt see a mistake in the add, then Luke has posted the photo that solved the  the mystery! I never really read the 'sub title' and was just reading the main description.
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: oldfart on September 24, 2010, 03:52:10 pm
Nathan did you buy it  ;D
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: NSR on September 24, 2010, 05:07:11 pm
I think it's time to go back to using the net for it's true purpose :D

(http://i712.photobucket.com/albums/ww125/NoelSR/th_Gatto.jpg?t=1285311642)
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Rossvickicampbell on September 24, 2010, 05:41:28 pm
Tony - be wer, wery careful - as you are still on probation and we might just send you back yet!!!!

Sandgropers unite!!!!!!!!
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Mike52 on September 24, 2010, 05:55:24 pm
Hysterical .  :)
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: YZ250H on September 24, 2010, 05:58:37 pm
I know Rossco - that's why I remained silent  :-X :-X ;D
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: lukeb1961 on September 24, 2010, 07:21:59 pm
it's my first time in a pub in my new role as a teetotaller. :)
That just sounds weird and depraved.
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: mainline on September 24, 2010, 08:10:50 pm
Probably why he's so cranky :)
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Lozza on September 24, 2010, 09:52:33 pm
Seems the noun turned into a verb "SHEDDED" went by everyone ::)
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: firko on September 24, 2010, 10:08:32 pm
Quote
Probably why he's so cranky
Cranky, Moi? Nah, I haven't been cranky in ages. I haven't been off the piss long enough to let it ruin my mojo. ;D
Title: Re: the first kid must have been a little prick
Post by: Curly3 on September 24, 2010, 10:18:44 pm
Firko's only narky because the ROOOOSTERS are in the GF and not his Bunny Wabbits.